14 comments to Shooting the Messenger Again???

  • Diva, you made valid points regarding the woman mitigating her own sexual health, BUT at what point in a relationship do you go “RAW”? I mean… if you are SUPPOSE to be in a monogamous relationship and you’ve done everything right (i.e. been tested and counseled initially before you decided to toss the protection to the wind), what if he “steps out” with a dude (or a woman) and contracts the virus? I get tested for HIV when I have my annual exam. I have to ask for it because it’s not included. My husband donates blood on the regular so he’s tested. But, how many people in so-called committed relationships do that? This is why I said that ol’ girl may need to be informed about the potential of sexual indescretions.

  • ARgalNo Gravatar

    Diva: You’re addressing two separate issues here……..past relationships and sexual responsibility.

    This was my exact thought before I got to this point in the convo. Sexual preference has absolutely nothing to do with sexual responsibility of ones self.

  • Sex was created for procreation and marital relations. Some people treat it as a god given recreation, that has no responsibilities attached. A woman will never know how many people (note people, not women) a man has slept with. A man simply is not going to tell you. I am not telling you, my mama, my best fried… You can play Matlock and try to figure stuff out from past stories, but that number won’t be accurate. Gay and HIV are not synonymous. I worry more about Herpes than AIDS.

  • This was one of the more thought provoking convos we’ve ever had. Yall should read some of the ones we wouldn’t DARE publish. ROFL!

  • Wow! That was an incredible conversation you guys. I read it twice and the second time really made me acknowledge points I’d missed the first time. I loved the questions that Creole put out, straightforward as usual, and appreciated the candid answers that Diva gave back in return. Straight up! As Creole stated, I can only imagine the convos that you guys have that will never see the light of day. -smile

  • Erica asked at what point do you go raw.

    You DON’T. If you can’t make enough of a commitment to marry and trust each other to be monogamous, then you can’t go raw. If you don’t want to have children with the person because you can’t afford it or you don’t want them to be tied to you permanently as a babymama/daddy, then you can’t go raw. Period. At all. Problem solved, very simply. Condoms are more affordable and convenient than clinic visits or diapers.

    And if you’re with someone who insists on raw or not at all, consider them too immature and irresponsible to be allowed into your life.

  • TNo Gravatar

    In this day and age, people have to put it all out there BEFORE they have sex with a person. Testing included.

  • TNo Gravatar

    And I 100% agree with what Glory said on going raw.

  • Shaniqua Dayshawan Moniquetta Jones???? LOLOLOLOL!!

    That’s a mess!

  • These are some great comments. Glory answered that question just as good as I would have. I love the fact that I know at least 8 people virtually who are intelligent enough to be responsible with their bodies.

  • You KNOW I counted doncha? ROFL!

  • I guess I’ll put in my one and a half cents…

    I do think in our community we focus way too much on DL brothers. On the other hand, I will venture to say that it’s our religious zealousness (is that a word?) that caused the DL phenomenon to grow and subsequently HIV’s growth in heterosexual women. But I admit, I hadn’t thought about prostitutes as a factor. Nowadays you have to ask about prostitutes as well as sex with strippers at bachelor parties etc. The bottom line is that test, test, test. If you can’t bring yourself to ask him to be tested with you, you clearly aren’t comfortable enough to be getting nekkid with him.

  • I was reading the comments and stopped when I read Glory’s. I have to agree with her. RAW? No way. Hell no.

  • I like the convo yall had. It does make since about being sexually responsible for yourself. Knowing if someone was/is gay or not does not abdicate one of their own responsibility. Cuz like you said, you don’t have to be homosexual in order to have and pass on HIV to someone. Someone hiding their being homosexual is no different to me than if you lying about having children that live with your mamma (that you don’t support).

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv Enabled